Case 1803014/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Din v Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust PRELIMINARY HEARING Heard: BY TELEPHONE (BT MEET ME) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1803014/2020
- Decision date
- 20 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Din
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 20 August 2020 before Employment Judge JM Wade, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by a solicitor. The hearing was remote and recorded by audio, with no objection from either party.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant's Employment Rights Act complaints about unlawful deductions from wages, described as 'I am owed other payments', concerned deductions from her salary in relation to overpayments and Temporary Injury Allowance from November 2019. Those complaints were withdrawn by the claimant at the hearing and were therefore dismissed.
The tribunal also recorded that Equality Act allegations of race discrimination relating to these and other matters continued, subject to a stay until 31 October 2020. No substantive finding was made on those discrimination allegations in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant's Employment Rights Act unlawful deductions from wages / 'I am owed other payments' complaints, concerning deductions from salary for overpayments and Temporary Injury Allowance from November 2019, were dismissed after the claimant withdrew them at the hearing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.