Case 1803015/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Telepko v Brazuka Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1803015/2019
- Decision date
- 7 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Telepko
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr A Telepko presented a complaint of unlawful deduction from wages against Brazuka Ltd. Standard case management orders required him to set out in writing, by 11 July 2019, the remedy sought together with any supporting evidence and documentation.
The claimant did not comply with that order, did not communicate with the Tribunal after presenting the claim, and did not attend the hearing on 7 August 2019. A telephone call to the claimant went to voicemail only. On the material before it, the Employment Judge concluded that it was in the interests of justice to dismiss the claim under Rule 47, because the claimant appeared not to be pursuing it and that was likely the reason for his non-attendance.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed pursuant to Rule 47 after the claimant did not attend, did not comply with the order to set out the remedy sought, and had not communicated with the Tribunal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.