Case 1803029/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs E Rooney v Your Friendly Local Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1803029/2022
- Decision date
- 20 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ayre
- Venue
- Sheffield
- Panel members
- Mrs N Arshad-Mather, Mr G Harker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs E Rooney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Rooney had been employed as Pub Manager at The Colin from 3 May 2019 and lived in accommodation above the pub as part of her employment package. After she told Mr Chris Windle in February 2021 that she was pregnant, the tribunal found that no pregnancy risk assessment was carried out despite her asking for one, and that in August 2021, shortly before maternity leave started, she was presented with a new contract changing her pay from a fixed salary of £21,000 to £10 an hour without her agreement.
The tribunal found that the respondent then required her to move out of the accommodation in March 2022 while she was on maternity leave, and later made clear that she could not return to her previous House Manager role on her planned return date of 6 June 2022. It held that this conduct amounted to dismissal under section 95 ERA 1996, and that the reason or principal reason was pregnancy and maternity, so the dismissal was automatically unfair under section 99 ERA 1996. The tribunal rejected the respondent's submission that her employment had transferred to The Colin Kimberworth Ltd under TUPE, finding that she had been dismissed before the transfer on 13 July 2022.
On the discrimination claim, the tribunal upheld five acts under section 18 Equality Act 2010: failure to risk assess, the new contract, the move-out requirement, refusal to let her return to her role, and dismissal. It held that the earlier acts were part of a continuing act of discrimination ending with dismissal, and alternatively that time should be extended as just and equitable. The tribunal applied the continuing act approach from Hendricks and Lyfar and referred to Robertson when considering the limitation issue.
On remedy, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £1,212 and £350 for loss of statutory employment rights on the unfair dismissal claim, but it awarded the claimant's loss of earnings and related financial loss under the discrimination claim to avoid double recovery. It assessed net loss of earnings, deducted earnings from other work and benefits, and awarded £14,169.26 for financial loss, £20,000 for injury to feelings in the middle Vento band, and £3,592.79 interest. It also found she was entitled to 21 days' holiday pay at £67.60 net per day, making £1,419.60, and the total award was £40,743.65.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Automatically unfair under section 99 ERA 1996. The tribunal found the respondent dismissed the claimant on 6 June 2022 by conduct: it required her to move out of accommodation tied to the job and would not allow her to return to her previous House Manager role after maternity leave. The tribunal rejected the respondent's TUPE position because the dismissal pre-dated the 13 July 2022 transfer. Remedy for this head was the basic award of £1,212 plus £350 for loss of statutory employment rights; the dismissal-related financial loss was compensated under the discrimination claim to avoid double recovery. | Upheld | — | £1,562 |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The tribunal upheld five section 18 Equality Act 2010 allegations: failure to carry out a pregnancy risk assessment; issuing a new contract in August 2021 changing salary from £21,000 to £10 per hour without agreement; requiring the claimant to move out of the pub accommodation in March 2022; not allowing her to return to her role; and dismissing her. It found the earlier acts formed a continuing act of discrimination ending with dismissal on 6 June 2022, and alternatively would have extended time as just and equitable. Remedy comprised £14,169.26 financial loss, £20,000 injury to feelings, and interest of £3,592.79. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | £37,762 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant had not taken holiday after starting maternity leave on 29 August 2021 and was entitled to accrued holiday pay up to termination on 6 June 2022. It awarded 21 days at £67.60 net per day, totalling £1,419.60. | Upheld | — | £1,420 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £40,744
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,212
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £15,939
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
9 references- section 99 ERA 1996
- section 18 Equality Act 2010
- section 123 Equality Act 2010
- Hendricks continuing act test
- Lyfar continuing act approach
- Robertson just and equitable extension
- Vento guidelines
- TUPE regulation 4
- TUPE regulation 7
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.