Case 1803036/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Moyo v Blessedhandshealthcare HELD by: CVP — 2021
- Case reference
- 1803036/2021
- Decision date
- 16 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shulman REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Moyo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss A Moyo worked for blessedhandshealthcare as a support worker, a business supplying care workers. She started work on 24 February 2021 and was paid for February 2021, but after that the respondent paid her nothing until her employment ended on 16 April 2021.
The tribunal found that the claimant was owed her monthly net wage of £994.24 for March 2021. It also found that for four days worked during the Easter holidays in April 2021 she was entitled to double time, calculated at a daily rate of £32.69 multiplied by two and then by four, producing £261.52.
Judgment was therefore entered for unlawful deduction of wages in the total net sum of £1,255.76. The reasons note that the claimant did not know her gross wage, so the judgment was given net after deduction of tax, and that she had no other claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal awarded net sums of £994.24 for March 2021 and £261.52 for four days at double time in April 2021, giving a grand total of £1,255.76. | Upheld | — | £1,256 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,256
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.