Case 1803050/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Seddon v Cavendish Property Investments Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1803050/2023
- Decision date
- 17 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T Knowles Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Seddon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Rule 21 hearing on 15 August 2023, heard by video at Leeds before Employment Judge T Knowles, the respondent did not appear. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £5,093.00 gross.
The tribunal rejected the breach of contract claim because the claimant had received and worked his notice period. It said the issue was non-payment, and that was covered by the wage award. It also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,817.30.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £662.00. On the figures recorded in the judgment, the monetary awards total £7,572.30.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £5,093.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £5,093 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal said the claimant was not dismissed in breach of contract because he received and worked his notice period; it treated the non-payment issue as covered by the wage award. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,817.30. | Upheld | — | £1,817 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £662.00. | Upheld | — | £662 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,572
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.