Case 1803052/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Aylward v Cavendish Property Investments Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1803052/2023
- Decision date
- 17 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T Knowles Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Aylward
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued after the respondent made no appearance. The claimant, Miss J Aylward, succeeded on her claim that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £8,836.14 gross in respect of that claim.
The tribunal rejected the breach of contract claim. It found that the claimant had received and worked her notice period, and that the issue identified by the claimant was the non-payment itself, which was dealt with through the wages award rather than as a separate contractual breach.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £7,121.67. In addition, it found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £654.90. The judgment records no separate interest award or other remedy beyond those sums.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £8,836.14. | Upheld | — | £8,836 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held there was no breach of contract because the claimant received and worked her notice period; the unpaid notice issue was covered by the wages award. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £7,121.67. | Upheld | — | £7,122 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £654.90. | Upheld | — | £655 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,613
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.