Case 1803071/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Ford and others (See attached Schedule) First v Zishan Zaman Second Respondent: Northstar Hotels Ltd Heard — 2021
- Case reference
- 1803071/2020
- Decision date
- 22 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Ford and others (See attached Schedule) First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 22 June 2021, Employment Judge Shepherd held that the claims against Northstar Hotels Ltd listed in the schedule were well-founded and succeeded. The scheduled complaints included notice pay, failure to provide a written pay statement, redundancy, unfair dismissal, unauthorised deductions from wages and outstanding holiday pay. The judgment records that remedy judgments were to be provided for the successful claims, but the supplied text does not set out any monetary awards.
Those claimants who had been made redundant and had not already pleaded a protective award were allowed to amend their claims to add claims under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, and those protective award claims were also found well-founded and succeeded. Further applications to amend were granted in respect of the claims set out in the attached schedule.
The claims of public interest disclosure detriment and dismissal were dismissed. The judgment also dismissed the listed duplicate claims as duplicates.
Claims and outcomes
8 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Failure to provide a written pay statement. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | Redundancy / redundancy payment claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Protective award claim allowed by amendment under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Unfair dismissal claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Outstanding holiday pay / annual leave claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Public interest disclosure detriment and dismissal claim. | Dismissed |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.