Case 1803108/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Grubb v One Pool & Spa Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1803108/2023
- Decision date
- 26 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Deeley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Grubb
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 23 May 2023. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the matter under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. On the papers, the tribunal declared that One Pool & Spa Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from Mr A Grubb's wages and ordered the respondent to pay him the gross sum of £900.
The judgment also records that Mr Grubb withdrew his unfair dismissal complaint by email on 12 June 2023. That complaint was dismissed on withdrawal. The hearing listed for 2 August 2023 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal declared that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £900. | Upheld | — | £900 |
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant withdrew this complaint by email on 12 June 2023. The judgment records that the complaint is dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £900
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.