Case 1803118/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Herrett v Wm Morrisons Supermarkets Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1803118/2021
- Decision date
- 9 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buckley Appearances
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Herrett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered preliminary time-limit issues in claims brought by Mr M Herrett against WM Morrisons Supermarkets plc.
The unfair dismissal claim was found to have been issued out of time. The tribunal found that it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to issue that claim in time, so it had no jurisdiction to hear it and struck it out.
The tribunal also found that the discrimination because of sex claim was issued out of time. It was not brought within such other period as the tribunal thought just and equitable, so the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear it and struck it out.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim was issued out of time, that it was reasonably practicable to issue it in time, and that it had no jurisdiction to hear the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The tribunal found the sex discrimination claim was issued out of time, that it was not brought within such other period as the tribunal thought just and equitable, and that it had no jurisdiction to hear the claim. | Struck out | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- reasonably practicable
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.