Case 1803129/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Mitchell v Thomas Crompton Recycling Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1803129/2021
- Decision date
- 12 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Mitchell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr S Mitchell did not attend the hearing. The tribunal therefore decided the case on the basis of the claim form, the response, and the evidence of Mr Crompton. It found that Mr Mitchell had been furloughed from 3 April to 15 May 2020, during which three bank holidays fell. He was paid £80 per day for those days, while his normal working pattern was a 10-hour day at £10 per hour.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The claimant alleged that the respondent failed to give him three days of holiday/holiday pay to which he was entitled. The tribunal found that there had been a £60 shortfall in pay for the three bank holidays in April and May 2020, but dismissed the claim as presented outside the three-month time limit under the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Regulation 15(5) of the Working Time Regulations 1998
- Regulation 30(2) of the Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.