Case 1803137/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Smith v RL UK (Trading) Limited t/a Pocket Geek Tech Repair By Assurant — 2022
- Case reference
- 1803137/2022
- Decision date
- 26 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Knowles Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Smith
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting as a Rule 21 judgment, recorded that Miss C Smith was employed by RL UK (Trading) Limited t/a Pocket Geek Tech Repair By Assurant, and amended the respondent's name to that company. The respondent did not appear at the hearing, which took place by video in Leeds on 26 September 2022.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. The claim therefore succeeded under the unlawful deduction from wages jurisdiction.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £1,000.00. No separate breakdown of the award was given beyond that figure.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,000.00. | Upheld | — | £1,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.