Mr S Hirst v Shaun White — 2022

Case reference: 1803153/2022
Decision date: 15 November 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Brain

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr S Hirst

Respondent

Shaun White

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

By correspondence dated 28 October 2022, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations and did not request a hearing.

Employment Judge Brain therefore struck out the claim on 15 November 2022. The judgment records no determination of the merits of any substantive complaint and no monetary award.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment does not identify the substantive head or heads of claim; it records only that 'the claim' was struck out because it had not been actively pursued.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.