Case 1803159/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Ibbotson (counsel) For the v Oxton Farm — 2023
- Case reference
- 1803159/2023
- Decision date
- 29 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies Appearances
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Ibbotson (counsel) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a response and did not attend. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013, the tribunal gave judgment on the claim.
The claimant withdrew the unlawful deduction from wages complaint for the period 21 December 2022 to 7 January 2023, and that claim was dismissed on withdrawal. The tribunal found the holiday pay complaint well-founded, holding that 0.6 days' accrued but untaken holiday remained unpaid on termination. It awarded £68.68 gross plus a 25% ACAS uplift of £17.17.
The wrongful dismissal complaint also succeeded. The tribunal held that the respondent breached contract by dismissing the claimant without twelve weeks' notice and awarded £6,868.56 damages, treated as a gross sum, plus a 25% uplift of £1,717.14. The unfair dismissal complaint succeeded as well, with a basic award of £11,134.50 and a capped compensatory award of £29,763.76; the tribunal noted these unfair dismissal awards were not grossed up.
The tribunal further upheld the complaint that the respondent unreasonably failed to provide written reasons for dismissal following a written request, and awarded two weeks' pay of £1,142. It recorded that the respondent had unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures and increased the awards in respect of wages, wrongful dismissal, unfair dismissal and holiday pay by 25%, subject to the cap point noted in relation to the unfair dismissal awards and the approach in Hardie Grant London Ltd v Aspden [2012] ICR D6 EAT.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint for the period 21 December 2022 to 7 January 2023 was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay 0.6 days' accrued but untaken holiday on termination; award comprised £68.68 gross holiday pay plus £17.17 ACAS uplift. | Upheld | — | £86 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Breach of contract for dismissal without twelve weeks' notice; award comprised £6,868.56 damages plus £1,717.14 ACAS uplift. | Upheld | — | £8,586 |
| Unfair dismissal | Succeeded; award comprised a £11,134.50 basic award and a £29,763.76 capped compensatory award. The tribunal noted these awards were not grossed up. | Upheld | — | £40,898 |
| Other | Complaint that the respondent failed to provide written reasons for dismissal following a written request; awarded two weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £1,142 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £50,712
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £11,135
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £29,764
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures
- Hardie Grant London Ltd v Aspden [2012] ICR D6 EAT
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.