Case 1803190/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Parr v Bradford District Care NHS Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 1803190/2021
- Decision date
- 18 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Venue
- By Telephone
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Parr
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing by telephone before Employment Judge JM Wade on 18 May 2022. The claimant, Ms K Parr, confirmed that her notice pay/breach of contract/constructive wrongful dismissal claim was not being pursued.
By consent, that complaint was dismissed. The record does not contain any merits findings on that claim and does not record any monetary award.
The judgment states that the claimant’s remaining Equality Act complaints were to proceed to a final hearing later in the year. No outcome is recorded for those remaining complaints in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | At the preliminary hearing on 18 May 2022, the claimant confirmed that her notice pay/breach of contract/constructive wrongful dismissal claim was not pursued, and the complaint was dismissed by consent. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.