Case 1803194/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Canning v D B Services (Leeds) Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1803194/2021
- Decision date
- 11 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Armstrong Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Canning
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs S Canning's claim for unfair dismissal succeeded. The tribunal, sitting at Leeds by CVP on 11 October 2021 before Employment Judge K Armstrong, recorded that the claimant attended in person and the respondent did not attend. Judgment was entered that the claimant was unfairly dismissed.
The tribunal awarded a basic award of £10,298.18 and a compensatory award of £10,125, making a total award of £20,423.18. The judgment does not set out separate reasons for the split between the two parts of the award, but it records the figures made payable to the claimant.
The claim for unlawful deductions from wages was dismissed. The tribunal stated that this claim failed because the claimant's employment had terminated.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £20,423 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed because the claimant's employment had terminated. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £20,423
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £10,298
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £10,125
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.