Case 1803210/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Christie v Constant Power Solutions — 2021
- Case reference
- 1803210/2021
- Decision date
- 9 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Christie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr L Christie brought an unfair dismissal claim against Constant Power Solutions. By letter dated 21 June 2021, the tribunal gave him an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on whether the claim should be struck out because he did not have the requisite two years' service for an unfair dismissal claim and therefore had no reasonable prospect of success.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge JM Wade struck out the claim.
The judgment records no remedy award, no other claim types, and no lay members sitting with the judge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal claim after giving the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 21 June 2021 to make representations or request a hearing on whether he had the requisite two years' service. The tribunal said the claim had no reasonable prospect of success because of the service issue, and the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.