Miss A Ahmed v Home Office — 2023

Case reference: 1803235/2022
Decision date: 14 July 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Ayre
Venue: Sheffield
Panel members: Ms BR Hodgkinson, Mr L Priestley

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss A Ahmed

Respondent

Home Office

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal, sitting at Sheffield before Employment Judge Ayre with two lay members, gave a unanimous judgment after a hearing on 11, 12, 13 and 14 July 2023.

The claimant's claims for direct disability discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments, and victimisation all failed and were dismissed. The claimant's application for a preparation time order also failed and was dismissed. The written judgment records that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within the specified time.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	The judgment records that the claim for direct disability discrimination failed and was dismissed.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Disability discrimination	The judgment records that the claim that the respondent failed to make reasonable adjustments failed and was dismissed.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Victimisation	The judgment records that the victimisation claim failed and was dismissed.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.