Case 1803254/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Green v Tiddlywinks Easingwold Limited Heard by CVP (remote video link) — 2022
- Case reference
- 1803254/2022
- Decision date
- 4 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Green
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss R Green brought claims against Tiddlywinks Easingwold Limited under case numbers 1803254/2022 and 1803641/2022. The hearing was conducted by CVP on 3 November 2022 before Employment Judge D N Jones, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by an HR representative.
The tribunal upheld the unlawful deduction from wages complaint. It found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages in the sums of £85 and £360.
The judgment ordered the respondent to pay those wages to the claimant. No separate award breakdown beyond the two wage sums is recorded in the written decision, and no other claims or remedies are mentioned in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found two unauthorised deductions from wages, in the sums of £85 and £360, and ordered those wages to be paid. | Upheld | — | £445 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £445
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.