Case 1803281/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Mellors Catering Services Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1803281/2021
- Decision date
- 25 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant worked for the Respondent as a general kitchen assistant and claimed that she had been underpaid holiday pay during a furlough period from March to September 2020. At the preliminary hearing she identified alleged underpayment dates of 1 and 29 May, 24 June, 24 July and 21 August 2020. The Tribunal treated these, for limitation purposes, as an alleged series of unauthorised deductions ending on 21 August 2020.
Because the Claimant did not contact ACAS until 9 June 2021, early conciliation did not extend the applicable time limit. The Tribunal found that the claim should have been presented by 20 November 2020 but was presented nearly seven months later.
The Tribunal accepted that it was not reasonably practicable for the Claimant to present the claim within the original three-month time limit, because she only had reason to query earlier furlough payments shortly before that limit expired. However, it did not accept that she then presented the claim within a further reasonable period, as she took no reasonable steps to research or enforce her rights until several months later. The claim was therefore dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The claim alleged underpayment of holiday pay during furlough from March to September 2020. The Tribunal considered the limitation issue both under the Working Time Regulations 1998 and as an unauthorised deduction from wages, and treated the alleged payments as a series of deductions for time-limit purposes. The claim was dismissed as out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- Regulation 30(2)(a) Working Time Regulations 1998
- Regulation 30(2)(b) Working Time Regulations 1998
- Section 23(3) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Section 23(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulation 30B Working Time Regulations 1998
- Section 207B Employment Rights Act 1996
- not reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.