Case 1803283/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Waite v Express Bifolding Doors — 2019
- Case reference
- 1803283/2019
- Decision date
- 28 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Waite
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge JM Wade recorded that the proceedings in case 1803283/2019 were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant, Mr C Waite. The judgment does not set out any substantive findings on liability, and it does not record a merits decision on the underlying dispute.
The judgment also records that the respondent’s application for costs was dismissed on withdrawal of that application. No monetary award was made in the judgment, and no legal test was set out because the case was disposed of on withdrawal rather than after a merits hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. It does not identify the substantive claim(s) in the body of the decision; this claim type is taken from the case listing categories. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. It does not identify the substantive claim(s) in the body of the decision; this claim type is taken from the case listing categories. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.