Case 1803285/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Mellors Catering Services Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1803285/2021
- Decision date
- 25 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant alleged that the Respondent had failed to pay the correct amount of holiday pay during a period from March to September 2020. The Tribunal treated the relevant alleged underpayments as a series ending on 21 August 2020, meaning the claim should have been presented by 20 November 2020. The Claimant did not contact ACAS until 9 June 2021 and presented the claim on 18 June 2021, so early conciliation did not extend the time limit.
The Tribunal found that during the autumn term of 2020 the Claimant and colleagues believed their furlough-period pay had not been right, raised the issue with management, and knew that a former colleague had made a Tribunal claim and received a payout. Although a senior manager had said the payments were correct, the Tribunal found that the Claimant took no steps within the time limit to check the position or how to enforce her rights.
The Tribunal did not accept that it was not reasonably practicable for the Claimant to present the claim in time. It found that information and advice about enforcing holiday pay rights and time limits was readily available, including from Government and ACAS sources. The claim was dismissed as out of time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The claim alleged underpayment of holiday pay during March to September 2020. The Tribunal considered limitation by reference to both Working Time Regulations 1998 holiday pay provisions and unauthorised deduction from wages provisions, and dismissed the claim as out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- Regulation 16(1) Working Time Regulations 1998
- Regulation 30(2)(a) Working Time Regulations 1998
- Regulation 30(2)(b) Working Time Regulations 1998
- Section 23(3) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Section 23(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulation 30B Working Time Regulations 1998
- Section 207B Employment Rights Act 1996
- not reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.