Case 1803286/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Mellors Catering Services Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1803286/2021
- Decision date
- 25 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant alleged that the Respondent had failed to pay the correct amount of holiday pay during a period from March to September 2020. The Tribunal considered the preliminary issue of whether the claim was out of time, treating the alleged underpayments as a series of unauthorised deductions ending on 21 August 2020. Because ACAS early conciliation did not begin until 9 June 2021, the early conciliation period did not extend the basic time limit, and the claim should ordinarily have been presented by 20 November 2020.
The Tribunal found that the first point at which the Claimant had cause to believe she might have been underpaid was when she saw a 13 November 2020 payslip showing a 20% top-up for the half-term break. It found that it was not reasonably practicable for her to research her rights, contact ACAS, and bring a claim within the one remaining week before the time limit expired.
The Tribunal also accepted that the claim was presented within a further reasonable period. It took account of the Claimant's cancer diagnosis and treatment from late December 2020 onwards, and the fact that she took action after Ms Batty contacted her at the end of May or beginning of June 2021 about a holiday pay claim. The Tribunal held that the claim would continue to be heard on its merits.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Preliminary hearing judgment only. The Tribunal decided the time-limit issue and held that the holiday pay claim could continue to be heard on its merits; liability and remedy were not determined. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- Regulation 16(1) Working Time Regulations 1998
- Regulation 30(2)(a) Working Time Regulations 1998
- Regulation 30(2)(b) Working Time Regulations 1998
- Section 23(3) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Section 23(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulation 30B Working Time Regulations 1998
- Section 207B Employment Rights Act 1996
- not reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.