Case 1803289/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Russell Bradley (Advocate) For the v Mr Chris Riley (solicitor) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1803289/2021
- Decision date
- 24 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry
- Panel members
- Mrs I Fox, Mr D Faulconbridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Russell Bradley (Advocate) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the final merits hearing on 20 to 23 March 2023, before Employment Judge Perry with Mrs I Fox and Mr D Faulconbridge, the tribunal dealt with complaints of sex discrimination, age discrimination, breach of contract, and unfair dismissal. The claimant was represented by Mr Russell Bradley and the respondent by Mr Chris Riley.
The tribunal recorded that the sex discrimination and age discrimination complaints were dismissed on withdrawal. The breach of contract complaint, alleging dismissal in breach of contract, failed and was dismissed.
The unfair dismissal complaint succeeded. The tribunal found that the claimant had been unfairly dismissed, but also found that it was inevitable she would have been dismissed by the same point. On that basis, the basic award was reduced to £807 and the compensatory award was reduced to nil.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment records that the claimant's complaint of sex discrimination was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Age discrimination | The judgment records that the claimant's complaint of age discrimination was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Breach of contract | The claimant's complaint that she was dismissed in breach of contract failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal unfair and held it was inevitable the claimant would have been dismissed by the same point. The basic award was reduced to £807 and the compensatory award to nil. | Upheld | — | £807 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £807
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £807
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £0
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.