Case 1803291/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Kruger-Jones v Covea Insurance plc — 2019
- Case reference
- 1803291/2019
- Decision date
- 15 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Kruger-Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a public preliminary hearing before Employment Judge JM Wade in Leeds on 8 November 2019. The claimant, Mrs S Kruger-Jones, appeared in person and the respondent, Covea Insurance PLC, was represented by counsel. The written judgment records that the claimant's complaints were dismissed because they had been presented outside the relevant time limit.
The tribunal did not make findings on the substance of the underlying complaints. Its only recorded reason for dismissal was limitation, and the judgment states that the reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written record also notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
No remedy was awarded, and the judgment does not contain any monetary figures. The public record therefore resolves the case on timeliness alone and does not include any merits determination.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaints at a public preliminary hearing because they were presented outside the relevant time limit. The judgment does not determine the underlying merits of the disability discrimination complaints. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.