Case 1803292/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K McGarry v Kingstown Furniture Limited [In Administration] — 2020
- Case reference
- 1803292/2019
- Decision date
- 24 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K McGarry
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal listed the matter as a strike out judgment under Rule 37. It recorded that by letter dated 13 February 2020 the claimant had been given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out.
The tribunal found that the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's letter dated 13 January 2020, had not actively pursued the claim, and had failed to make representations in writing, or any sufficient representations, explaining why strike out should not follow, or to request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim.
No substantive liability issues or monetary remedy were determined in the judgment. The decision was signed by Employment Judge D N Jones on 24 February 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim under Rule 37 after the claimant failed to comply with the tribunal's letter dated 13 January 2020, did not make representations in response to the letter dated 13 February 2020, and had not actively pursued the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.