Case 1803295/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Snell v Kingstown Furniture Limited [In Administration] — 2020
- Case reference
- 1803295/2019
- Decision date
- 24 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Snell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37. It recorded that by letter dated 13 February 2020 the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out.
The reasons given were that the claimant had not complied with rule 37 and had not complied with the tribunal's letter dated 13 January 2020. The tribunal also found that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The tribunal noted that the claimant had failed to make representations in writing, or had failed to make any sufficient representations, explaining why strike out should not be ordered or requesting a hearing. On that basis, the claim was struck out. The judgment was signed by Employment Judge D N Jones on 24 February 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying cause of action; it states only that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.