Case 1803304/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss B Ventour v Miss C Singleton t/a Taylor Taylor Nails and Beauty — 2019
- Case reference
- 1803304/2019
- Decision date
- 21 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss B Ventour
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Sheffield on 13 August 2019, Employment Judge Brain held that Miss C Singleton t/a Taylor Taylor Nails and Beauty had made an unlawful deduction from Miss B Ventour's wages. The tribunal awarded £40 gross in respect of that deduction.
The tribunal also held that Miss Ventour was entitled to compensation for holidays she had taken but for which she had not been paid, and for holidays accrued due but untaken at the date the contract of employment ended. It awarded £532.97 gross for that holiday entitlement.
The tribunal ordered both payments to be made on or before 27 August 2019. No further reasons are set out in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unlawful deduction from wages and ordered payment of £40 gross. | Upheld | — | £40 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal held the claimant was entitled to compensation for holidays taken but unpaid, and for holiday accrued but untaken on termination, and ordered £532.97 gross. | Upheld | — | £533 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £573
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.