Case 1803305/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Kluj v Timothy James Holdings Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1803305/2021
- Decision date
- 29 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Kluj
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Miss D Kluj against Timothy James Holdings Ltd. It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £480.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £480. The hearing listed for 20 August 2021 was cancelled. The judgment is dated 29 July 2021 and was signed by Employment Judge D N Jones.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £480. | Upheld | — | £480 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £480. | Upheld | — | £480 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £960
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.