Case 1803346/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Parsons-Oldfield v Jake O’Neill — 2022
- Case reference
- 1803346/2022
- Decision date
- 21 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Parsons-Oldfield
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Maidment determined the claim without a hearing and made a default judgment on the papers. The claimant was Miss A Parsons-Oldfield and the respondent was Jake O’Neill.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,000. The judgment did not split that sum between separate heads of loss.
The tribunal also stated that failure to pay pension contributions was a matter for the Pensions Regulator. It further recorded that it had no jurisdiction to award compensation for costs for resourcing the claim, loss of financial opportunities, or injury to feelings. The hearing listed for 5 October 2022 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the tribunal determined the claim on that basis. | Upheld | — | £1,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.