Case 1803350/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Arnold v Food and Fuel Break Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1803350/2022
- Decision date
- 7 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Venue
- By CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Arnold
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss L Arnold brought claims for unlawful deductions from wages and unpaid holiday pay. She had resigned before presenting the claim on 11 July 2022, and there was no limitation issue. The claim was accepted and the tribunal sent the notice of hearing and response documents to Food and Fuel Break Limited on 2 August 2022, with a response due by 30 August 2022.
The respondent did not present a response by that date. It later emailed a response on 10 September 2022, together with a counterclaim alleging that the claimant had taken money from the till in cash. The Legal Officer rejected the late extension application on 21 September 2022 because no reason for the delay had been given and the application had not been copied to the claimant for comment.
At the hearing, the respondent again asked for time to be extended, saying the deadline had been misunderstood and referring to the director working seven days a week, personal life and childcare. Employment Judge JM Wade refused the application, noting the timing of the request, the inconsistency with the respondent’s earlier email of 10 September 2022, the prejudice to the claimant from further delay, and the fact that the respondent had known about the allegation since 2 August 2022. The judge also said the alleged defence, that the claimant had already been paid in cash from the till, was only a bare allegation and that there had been no prompt supporting evidence.
Because time was not extended, the tribunal gave judgment on the material before it. The claimant’s claims succeeded, with a gross award of £532 for unpaid wages and £121.60 for unpaid holiday pay, making a total award of £653.60. The tribunal noted only a limited reduction to the holiday pay claim because the claimant had said she had 'guessed' the amount due, but the figure could still be calculated from the information available.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held the claim for unpaid wages succeeded and awarded the gross sum of £532. The respondent’s late response and counterclaim were not admitted, and judgment was given on the material before the tribunal. | Upheld | — | £532 |
| Holiday pay | The claim for unpaid holiday pay succeeded. The tribunal noted the claimant had 'guessed' the holiday pay due, but it could calculate the sum from the information available and awarded £121.60, described as 1.6 weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £122 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £654
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.