Case 1803363/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Enderwick v Joseph Rowntree Housing Trust — 2020
- Case reference
- 1803363/2020
- Decision date
- 1 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Enderwick
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike-out judgment in Miss L Enderwick's claim against Joseph Rowntree Housing Trust. The Tribunal noted that by letter dated 16 September 2020 it had given the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because the Tribunal considered it did not have jurisdiction to hear an unfair dismissal complaint as the claimant did not have the qualifying service needed.
The claimant did not make written representations and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. No remedy was awarded or considered in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out under rule 37 after the Tribunal indicated it did not have jurisdiction to consider the unfair dismissal claim because the claimant did not appear to have the qualifying service required. The claimant did not make written representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 16 September 2020. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.