Case 1803369/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Kausar and others (see Schedule) v Shans Supermarkets Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1803369/2023
- Decision date
- 10 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Kausar and others (see Schedule)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Leeds, Employment Judge Cox heard the claims from 7 to 10 May 2024. Mrs R Begum and Mr N Ali did not attend and were not represented, and their claims were dismissed under Rule 47 of the Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure. The remaining claimants pursued claims against Shans Supermarkets Limited for notice pay, unpaid wages, accrued holiday pay on termination, and unfair dismissal.
The tribunal dismissed all claims for damages for failure to give notice of dismissal, all claims for unpaid wages, and all claims for accrued holiday pay due on termination of employment. On unfair dismissal, Mrs S Fazal and Mrs I Javed succeeded and were found unfairly dismissed. The tribunal made no award of compensation, and all other unfair dismissal claims were dismissed.
The Claimants’ application for reconsideration of paragraphs 3 and 5 of the decision was refused because the tribunal considered there was no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claims for damages for failure to give notice of dismissal were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | All claims for unpaid wages were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | All claims for accrued holiday pay due on termination of employment were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Mrs S Fazal and Mrs I Javed were found unfairly dismissed, but all other unfair dismissal claims were dismissed and the tribunal made no award of compensation. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £0
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 47 of the Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure
- no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.