Case 1803393/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Sills v Secretary of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy — 2021
- Case reference
- 1803393/2021
- Decision date
- 8 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Sills
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent's response was struck out. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant gross sums of £3,360 for unpaid wages and £1,083.60 for accrued but untaken holiday entitlement as at the date of termination.
The respondent had been ordered to show cause why judgment should not be entered for the amounts set out in earlier case management orders. The tribunal found that the respondent's letter did not engage with the jurisdictional and other issues previously raised, and noted that judgment had already been made against the claimant's employer, which had since become insolvent.
The tribunal recorded that the respondent reasserted it could not determine the amounts due and referred to allegations of fraud about the claimant's representations concerning his contractual relationship. The tribunal stated that the amounts had already been determined at a previous hearing, applied the Employment Rights Act 1996 limits and the cap on a week's pay, and noted that the claimant had not disputed the calculated figures.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment awards a gross sum in respect of unpaid wages after the respondent's response was struck out. | Upheld | — | £3,360 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment awards a gross sum in respect of accrued but untaken holiday entitlement as at termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £1,084 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,444
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Employment Rights Act 1996 limits
- cap on a week's pay
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.