Case 1803403/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Mr P Blundell, Director — 2019
- Case reference
- 1803403/2019
- Decision date
- 1 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shulman Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Leeds hearing on 24 September 2019 before Employment Judge Shulman, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr P Blundell, Director. The judgment records that the claims for discrimination pregnancy or maternity, flexible working, bullying, and incorrect payments were dismissed because the claimant withdrew them. The claim described as 'other payment' was dismissed after the tribunal was notified that it had been settled.
The tribunal also recorded a consent disposal of the remaining wages issue: the respondent was to pay the claimant £1,339.52 net by way of unauthorised deduction of wages. The judgment contains no further findings on liability or remedy beyond the recorded withdrawals, settlement, and consent payment.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Flexible working | Dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The claim of bullying was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The claim of 'other payment' was dismissed after the tribunal was notified that the claim had been settled. | Settled | — | — |
| Other | The claim of incorrect payments was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | By consent, the respondent was to pay the claimant £1,339.52 net by way of unauthorised deduction of wages. | Settled | — | £1,340 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,340
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.