Case 1803413/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Franklin v Bramley Tyres — 2023
- Case reference
- 1803413/2023
- Decision date
- 9 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wilkinson Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Franklin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr M Franklin's claim against Bramley Tyres was heard remotely at Leeds Employment Tribunal on 9 November 2023 before Employment Judge Wilkinson. The respondent did not present a valid response on time and did not apply to extend time, so the tribunal proceeded under rule 21 after hearing the claimant's evidence.
The tribunal entered judgment in favour of the claimant for three unpaid sums. It ordered the respondent to pay a statutory redundancy payment of £4,617.00, notice pay of £2,052.00, and accrued but untaken holiday pay of £128.25.
The total judgment amount was £6,797.25. The decision does not record any additional findings beyond the monetary entitlements and the respondent's failure to file a valid response.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Tribunal ordered payment of a statutory redundancy payment of £4,617.00. | Upheld | — | £4,617 |
| Breach of contract | Tribunal ordered payment of notice pay of £2,052.00. | Upheld | — | £2,052 |
| Holiday pay | Tribunal ordered payment for accrued but untaken holiday pay of £128.25. | Upheld | — | £128 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,797
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.