Case 1803460/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Stephenson, counsel v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 1803460/2021
- Decision date
- 4 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Members
- Venue
- Sheffield
- Panel members
- Mr K Lannaman, Mr W Roberts
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Stephenson, counsel
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Sheffield from 28 February to 4 March 2022 before Employment Judge Cox with members Mr K Lannaman and Mr W Roberts. The judgment names Mr C Benjamin as claimant and two respondents: the Interim Executive Board for the Federated Governing Body for Holgate Meadows and Heritage Park, and Sheffield City Council.
The extracted judgment text states only the dispositive outcome: "These claims fail and are dismissed." On the basis of the gov.uk listing categories and the case context supplied, the claims were race discrimination and unfair dismissal claims, and both were dismissed. No liability findings, factual findings, or reasoning are included in the supplied text.
No monetary award is recorded in the extracted judgment text, and no remedy breakdown is provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment text records only that the claims failed and were dismissed; it does not set out the tribunal's reasoning or any separate remedy for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The extracted judgment text records only that the claims failed and were dismissed; it does not set out the tribunal's reasoning or any separate remedy for this claim. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.