Case 1803464/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Loading page content.
TopCase 1803464/2020 · Employment Tribunal
This was a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to present a response. The tribunal recorded that the claim had been sent to the respondent's operating premises and registered office.
The tribunal found that Misura Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from Mr G Guest's wages and had failed to pay holiday pay on the termination of employment. Those claims were upheld.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £2,212. The judgment does not break that figure down between the two successful claims.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; the gross award was not apportioned between claims. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment; the gross award was not apportioned between claims. | Upheld | — | — |
The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.