Case 1803524/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Linley v Blue Jay Recruitment Services Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1803524/2022
- Decision date
- 12 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Linley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 23 March 2023, the Tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why its response should not be struck out because it had not complied with the Tribunal's order of 6 February 2023 and because the matter had not been actively pursued. The respondent did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the response. The judgment records that the respondent remains entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions of the Tribunal, but may only participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge. No substantive liability or remedy findings are recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment struck out the respondent's response after the respondent failed to comply with the Tribunal's order dated 6 February 2023 and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 23 March 2023. The judgment does not determine the substantive claim on its merits. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.