Miss N Jahan v Ashiana Sheffield Ltd — 2019

Case reference: 1803526/2019
Decision date: 29 October 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Rostant Date

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss N Jahan

Respondent

Ashiana Sheffield Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal struck out Miss N Jahan's unfair dismissal complaint against Ashiana Sheffield Ltd. The judgment states that the complaint was brought under sections 94 and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, but the strike-out reasons turned on section 108, which requires two years' service to bring an unfair dismissal claim.

The tribunal found that the claimant did not have the necessary service. On that basis, the unfair dismissal claim could not proceed and was struck out under rule 37. The judgment does not record any merits findings on the dismissal itself.

The tribunal noted that the claimant's remaining claims stayed listed for hearing on 21-23 January 2020. No monetary award was made in this judgment.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The unfair dismissal complaint was struck out because s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996 requires two years' service and the claimant lacked the necessary service.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

3 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.