Case 1803549/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Rauf v Anchor Hanover Group — 2020
- Case reference
- 1803549/2019
- Decision date
- 16 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Members
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Mr T Downes, Mr K Lannaman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Rauf
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant did not attend the hearing on 9 November 2020. The Tribunal unanimously dismissed the claims pursuant to rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.
The respondent applied for costs of £3,750, described as counsel's fees for the hearing. The Tribunal had not made a final costs order in this judgment; it stated that it was considering an order under rule 76 and gave the claimant 14 days from the date the judgment was sent to make representations. The Tribunal also noted that rule 84 permits regard to the claimant's ability to pay.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment dismisses all claims under rule 47 following the claimant's non-attendance. The specific disability discrimination claim type is taken from the listing category rather than detailed reasoning in the judgment text. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment dismisses all claims under rule 47 following the claimant's non-attendance. The specific race discrimination claim type is taken from the listing category rather than detailed reasoning in the judgment text. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 47
- rule 76
- rule 84
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.