Case 1803571/2021 · Employment Tribunal
C Hoyle v RM Motor Engineers Limited AT A HEARING — 2021
- Case reference
- 1803571/2021
- Decision date
- 3 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
C Hoyle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 2 September 2021 before Employment Judge Lancaster, sitting in Leeds by CVP, the tribunal considered C Hoyle's claim against RM Motor Engineers Limited. The claimant was represented in person and the respondent by its director, S Puckering.
The tribunal upheld the claim and found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. The deduction related to 5.28 days of accrued holiday pay that was contractually due on termination.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £644.16 gross. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of 5.28 days accrued holiday pay contractually due on termination and ordered payment of £644.16 gross. | Upheld | — | £644 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £644
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.