Case 1803572/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Sharples (solicitor) v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 1803572/2021
- Decision date
- 6 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr N Sharples (solicitor)
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mrs S Holmes, was Deputy Town Clerk. Her contract provided that untaken holiday would be paid on termination at 1/260th of salary for each untaken day. Holiday was arranged informally with her line manager, Mr Draper, and the dispute arose over the amount due when her employment ended in February 2021.
The tribunal found that she had booked a two-week holiday to Turkey in July 2020, later went to the UK coast, and was away for at least five of the ten booked days. Those five days were treated as holiday taken and therefore not payable. The tribunal also considered the respondent's November 2020 furlough memo, under which staff were to receive 100% of salary in return for giving up one day's annual leave for each week of furlough. It held that furlough at full pay was such a fundamental change that it required express agreement, and that a later change to a less beneficial arrangement could be relied on once communicated. On the evidence, 10 days' leave were deducted under that arrangement.
By the end of employment the parties agreed the gross holiday balance was 35.8 days. The respondent had already paid £773.57 for untaken holiday, but the tribunal concluded that 15 days should be deducted overall and that the respondent was in breach of contract only to that extent. Damages were rounded to £1,593. The judge did not make any Regulation 14 Working Time Regulations award because that issue had not been pleaded in the claim form or added by amendment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claim for unpaid holiday pay on termination partly succeeded. The tribunal found that 5 days of booked July 2020 leave had been taken and that a further 10 days were deductible under the November 2020 furlough/leave arrangement. The respondent had paid £773.57 gross; damages were assessed at £1,593. The judge did not determine any Working Time Regulations claim because none was pleaded in the claim form or amended into the case. | Upheld | — | £1,593 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,593
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,593
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.