Case 1803587/2019 · Employment Tribunal
No attendance v Aedis Regulatory Services Ltd (in liquidation) — 2019
- Case reference
- 1803587/2019
- Decision date
- 27 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Representation
- Venue
- Hull
Parties
2 namedClaimant
No attendance
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal amended the respondent's name to Aedis Regulatory Services Limited (in liquidation). It upheld the claimant's claim of unauthorised deduction from wages in relation to his June 2019 wages and ordered the respondent to pay £2,041.90 in respect of that deduction.
The claim for accrued holiday pay failed. The tribunal said it was not satisfied that the claimant's employment had terminated at the date of the claim, so the holiday pay claim was not made out on the material before it.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claim for unauthorised deduction from wages in relation to June 2019 wages succeeded and ordered payment of £2,041.90. | Upheld | — | £2,042 |
| Holiday pay | The claim for accrued holiday pay failed because the tribunal was not satisfied that the claimant's employment had terminated at the date of the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,042
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.