Mrs J Ashworth v Abondanza Limited — 2022

Case reference: 1803609/2022
Decision date: 17 October 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Miller Representation
Venue: Hull remotely

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs J Ashworth

Respondent

Abondanza Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The claimant, Mrs J Ashworth, brought claims against Abondanza Limited that were heard remotely at Hull on 17 October 2022 before Employment Judge Miller. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons were provided.

The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £67. It also upheld her claim that she had not been paid her full entitlement to untaken holiday on termination of employment under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £110.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £67.	Upheld	—	£67
Holiday pay	The tribunal found the claimant had not been paid her full entitlement to untaken holiday on termination under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and ordered payment of the gross sum of £110.	Upheld	—	£110

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £177; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.