Case 1803618/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Jackson v New Look Retailers Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1803618/2019
- Decision date
- 30 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Jackson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs S Jackson brought complaints against New Look Retailers Ltd of direct discrimination, indirect discrimination, and failure to meet the duty to make reasonable adjustments. In a judgment on withdrawal dated 29 October 2019 and sent to the parties on 30 October 2019, Employment Judge Cox Date recorded that those complaints were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment does not record any merits findings or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Indirect discrimination complaint; dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct discrimination complaint; dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of failure to meet the duty to make reasonable adjustments; dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.