Case 1803619/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P King v C22Ltd T/A Catch 22 — 2019
- Case reference
- 1803619/2019
- Decision date
- 4 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Keevash Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P King
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr P King’s claim against C22Ltd T/A Catch 22 was heard at Leeds on 3 September 2019 before Employment Judge Keevash. The claimant was not present and was not represented. The respondent was represented by Mr M McNelly, Consultant.
The judgment records that the claim form was amended to substitute C22Ltd T/A Catch 22 as the respondent’s name. The tribunal then dismissed the claim.
The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons were provided. The decision was sent to the parties on 4 September 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not identify the legal basis of the claim; the GOV.UK listing categorised it as unlawful deduction from wages, but that is not stated in the judgment itself. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.