In person v Mr Blair . — 2021

Case reference: 1803639/2021
Decision date: 3 September 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge JM Wade

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

In person

Respondent

Mr Blair .

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The claimant's claim for wrongful dismissal succeeded. Employment Judge JM Wade ordered the respondent to pay the claimant net damages of £80. The judgment does not break that sum down into separate heads of loss, and the extracted text does not record any further reasoning beyond the outcome.

The respondent's counterclaim was dismissed. No discrimination, unfair dismissal, or other statutory claims are identified in the extracted text, and no additional remedy was awarded beyond the £80 damages on the wrongful dismissal claim.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Wrongful dismissal	The judgment states that the claimant's claim for wrongful dismissal succeeds and that the respondent shall pay net damages of £80.	Upheld	—	£80
Other	The respondent's counterclaim was dismissed; the extracted text does not specify a separate legal label for the counterclaim.	Dismissed	—	—

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £80; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.