Case 1803644/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Wilson v 3GS (UK) Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1803644/2019
- Decision date
- 1 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Wilson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr C Wilson, brought claims against 3GS (UK) Limited for unlawful deduction from wages, unfair dismissal, and wrongful dismissal. The tribunal sat at Leeds before Employment Judge JM Wade on 30 October 2019. The respondent was represented by counsel and the claimant appeared in person.
By consent, the tribunal recorded that the respondent would pay the claimant the net sum of £200.28 in respect of unlawfully deducted wages. The judgment does not set out any separate remedy breakdown for that sum and records it as a single net payment.
The tribunal also found that the claimant’s claims of unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal were not well founded and dismissed both claims.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal recorded that, by consent, the respondent would pay the claimant the net sum of £200.28 in respect of unlawfully deducted wages. | Settled | — | £200 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the wrongful dismissal claim was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £200
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.