Case 1803659/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Hanson v Jonathan Blackburn — 2019
- Case reference
- 1803659/2019
- Decision date
- 10 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shulman REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Hanson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Leeds on 3 September 2019, before Employment Judge Shulman, the claimant appeared in person. The respondent, Jonathan Blackburn, did not appear, was not represented, and did not file a response. The tribunal held that the correct respondent in the matter was Jonathan Blackburn.
The judgment records four monetary awards in the claimant's favour: a redundancy payment of £1,558.40, £346.41 in respect of unauthorised deduction of wages, holiday pay of £485.03, and notice pay of £1,039.23. The judgment does not set out separate findings on each head beyond making those awards, and it records a grand total of £3,429.07.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,558 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award expressed in the judgment as unauthorised deduction of wages. | Upheld | — | £346 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £485 |
| Breach of contract | Award expressed in the judgment as notice pay. | Upheld | — | £1,039 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,429
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.