Case 1803666/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 1803666/2019
- Decision date
- 23 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Leeds on 23 July 2020, Employment Judge Cox recorded that the claimant was in person and the respondent was represented by Miss McGee, counsel. The only claims addressed in the judgment were holiday pay and a redundancy payment.
Both claims were dismissed because they were withdrawn by the claimant. The judgment does not record any substantive determination on liability or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Dismissed at the preliminary hearing following withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Dismissed at the preliminary hearing following withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.